Legal actions initiated against Citron

Posted by The Citron Fraud Examiners on October 10, 2012 under The Truth | 1,015 Comments to Read

Qihoo plans legal action against Citron

Qihoo 360 Technology Co. Ltd. (“Qihoo 360″ or the “Company,” NYSE: QIHU), a leading Internet company in China, today initiate legal procedure against Citron Research and its main contributor Mr. Andrew Left (“Citron”). The Company has sent a letter to Citron and demands Citron immediately cease and desist from committing any and all improper and/or illegal activities in relation to its untruthful publications or statements regarding Qihoo 360. Without limiting the generality of the forgoing, the Company demands Citron (1) correct or remove those untruthful sections in the Publications within ten (10) days upon the receipt of the letter, and (2) apologize to Qihoo 360 for Citron’s undue activities. Qihoo 360 reserves its right to pursue further legal remedies.

Qihoo sues Citron

Source: Qihoo’s announcement on Sina Weibo

 

Kai-Fu Lee initiates legal action against Citron

I wrote a fact-based report challenging Citron’s reports on China search companies.  Citron has not explained any of the errors I brought up, but instead has attacked me personally with accusations that have no factual basis and are not truthful.  Such malicious statements have been deliberately and publicly made in order to damage my reputation, in an attempt to avoid address my criticisms of Citron’s report.  I have no choice but to file a lawsuit against Citron and Mr. Andrew Left.

Letter from Chinese Top Web Game Companies to Citron

Posted by The Citron Fraud Examiners on September 13, 2012 under The Truth | 997 Comments to Read

We, a group of nine Chinese gaming companies, join forces to take up Citron on its recent challenge that Qihoo’s ARPU claim of 400 RMB is fraudulent, “demonstrated” by Citron’s comparisons with other gaming companies in its reports. We prove here that Citron’s analysis lacked basic understanding of the Chinese gaming market. Citron compared different types of companies against each other, and didn’t even understand how ARPU is measured (!). We pooled our gaming statistics together to form a trusted third-party validation of gaming ARPU for Qihoo and its true peers, and we found that: 1) Qihoo’s ARPU is just about average in a group of five comparable gaming platform companies, and 2) The average ARPU of a large number of popular games on the Qihoo platform is also in line with Qihoo’s reported number. Like the earlier reports published on www.citronfraud.com, this report once again shows that Citron knows very little about Chinese market and companies, and that its analysis is as amateurish as its claims outrageous.

Read more of this article »

Response to Citron’s Legal Threat

Posted by The Citron Fraud Examiners on under The Truth | 1,052 Comments to Read

Read more of this article »

Media Reports Blast Citron for Erroneous Reports

Posted by The Citron Fraud Examiners on September 12, 2012 under The Truth | 102 Comments to Read

WSJ-Chinese Backlash Hits Short Seller

Bloomberg-Chinese Executives Sign Letter Denouncing Short Sellers

China Daily-Industry leaders protest Citron Research's reports

Read more of this article »

WSJ Report on Citron: Chinese Backlash Hits Short Seller

Posted by The Citron Fraud Examiners on September 3, 2012 under The Truth | 1,461 Comments to Read

Chinese Backlash Hits Short Seller

BY LORETTA CHAO

BEIJING—A number of prominent technology leaders in China, including current and former executives from Google Inc. and Microsoft Corp., are mounting an offensive against short seller Citron Research as they protest a spate of what they call unfair and inaccurate attacks on U.S.-listed Chinese companies.

Led by Kai-Fu Lee, former head of Google’s operations in the country, a group of more than 60 executives, investors and entrepreneurs signed a letter accusing China-focused short sellers—particularly Citron—of “targeting legitimate companies with either no problems or minimal problems,” manipulating information to write reports that “boldly tell lies, knowing that their American readers have … [Link to the full story]

Chinese Business Leaders Condemn Citron

Posted by The Citron Fraud Examiners on under The Truth | 1,256 Comments to Read

Chinese Business Leaders Condemn Citron

_____________________

Citron is an “investment analysis company” owned by Mr. Andrew Left, a man with a long record of fraud, deceit, and unlawful behavior. Citron’s reports take advantage of the information asymmetry between China and the US, and boldly tell lies, knowing that their American readers have no way of verifying them.  

We are investment professionals and company founders/executives in China.  We are joining together in this effort to expose and condemn the deception and ignorance of Citron and other short sellers like them.  This English website (citronfraud.com) is being created to host this ongoing fight against fraud. 

We urge investors to seek trustworthy professionals for investment advice regarding Chinese companies, and not rely on institutions and individuals with fraudulent history, falsified expertise, and interest conflict.

_____________________

To Whom It May Concern:

For the past few years, a number of “China Short Sellers” have been publishing negative reports on Chinese companies (typically listed in the US).  When these reports were accurate and discovered problems in the Chinese companies, they have helped cleanse the environment.

However, recently some of these “China Short Sellers” started targeting legitimate companies with either no problems or minimal problems.  Their reports would take advantage of the information asymmetry between China and the US, and boldly tell lies, knowing that their American readers have no way of verifying them.  An example of such a report is Short Seller Citron Research’s report “Qihoo’s entry into search puts SOHU in play“, which has been critiqued by Dr. Kai-Fu Lee in his “China Short Sellers: Exposing Fraud, or Practicing Fraud?” We applaud Dr. Lee’s accurate exposure of Citron’s seven errors of gargantuan proportions.

We are investment professionals and company founders/executives in China.  We strongly believe there is a huge pool of legitimate, exciting, and valuable companies in China.  Citron and other short sellers’ recent efforts to slam legitimate companies and deceive investors are despicable.  We are joining together to expose and condemn the deception and ignorance of Citron and other short sellers like them.  This English website (citronfraud.com) is being created to host this ongoing fight against fraud.

Finally, China is not well understood by foreign investors, so we urge investors to seek trustworthy professionals for investment advice regarding Chinese companies, and not rely on institutions and individuals with fraudulent history, falsified expertise, and serious interest conflict.

Signed on behalf of individuals (listed alphabetically within each group): Read more of this article »

About Citron and Andrew Left

Posted by The Citron Fraud Examiners on August 17, 2012 under The Truth | 1,173 Comments to Read

The Dark Side of Andrew Left

Citron Research is a one-man show run by Mr. Andrew Left, whose fraudulent career began with a huge black mark.   In 1998, in his first job, Mr. Left was found by the National Futures Association to have: “MADE FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS TO CHEAT, DEFRAUD OR DECEIVE A CUSTOMER IN VIOLATION OF NFA COMPLIANCE RULES 2-2(a) AND 2-29(a)(1). ”  Mr. Left was debarred for three years, among other punishments.  This finding can be found on the website of the National Futures Association.

After being debarred, Mr. Left was employed as the President & CEO of Detour Media in 1999.  But in February 2002, his company sued him for stealing six checks worth about $25,000.  In Detour Media’s official SEC filing, the company alleged Mr. Left’s “fraud and deceit, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty and unlawful monetary conversion.”  This legal paperwork, as well as the final judgment (Mr. Left had to pay $26,445.22) can be found on Court orders Mr. Left to pay $26,445.62 for lawsuit (fraud and deceit).

In 2005, Mr. Left founded www.stocklemon.com, a predecessor to www.citronresearch.com.  On this website, he slammed a company called WHIS, and one of WHIS’s principals, Mr. Salim Rana.  He fabricated information about Mr. Rana (calling him a thief who steal from the elderly), and Mr. Rana sued Mr. Left for libel.  Mr. Left failed to comply with the court’s order for discovery.  As a result, the court issued a judgment, ordering Mr. Left to pay Mr. Rana $2,500,000 for damages.  The documents can be found here: Court orders Mr. Left to pay $2,500,805.64 for lawsuit (libel)

In 2010, Mr. Left again ran into trouble with the law, in an altercation with a businessman.  He was arrested in Florida.  In addition, the records show that he was charged for “failing to appear.”  His arrest record, along with his mug shot, can be found here.

One has to wonder why an investor would trust the investment advice of someone with a record of fraud, deceit, and unlawful behavior.

 

Citron’s Methodology

Andrew Left’s company Citron provides investment advice, typically in the form of shorting stocks that Citron believes to be fraudulent or have “terminal business models.”  Citron also invests its own money, and presumably makes its short trades before its readers do, and gets in at a better price than its readers.

Citron began shorting and attacking Chinese stocks in 2006, with a good record until mid-2011. This “golden period” was made possible by a wave of reverse mergers that took a number of fraudulent Chinese companies public. Citron and its customers made good profit from 2006 until 2011 by exposing these fraudulent companies. Read more of this article »

Court orders Mr. Left to pay $2,500,805.64 for lawsuit (libel)

Posted by The Citron Fraud Examiners on August 16, 2012 under The Truth | 1,785 Comments to Read

Read more of this article »

Court orders Mr. Left to pay $26,445.62 for lawsuit (fraud and deceit)

Posted by The Citron Fraud Examiners on August 15, 2012 under The Truth | 1,045 Comments to Read

Read more of this article »